Methods for assessing reliability of a utility company&#39;s power system

ABSTRACT

Methods are provided for assessing reliability of a power system of a utility company. At least one main overview display is obtained. Violation markers are displayed on the one main overview display. A monitored elements tab is updated with a list of monitored elements.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 60/952,021 filedJul. 26, 2007, which application is fully incorporated herein byreference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally systems and methods that improve energymanagement, and more particularly to systems and methods for the utilitymarket.

2. Description of the Related Art

The modern electric power grid begins as the primary circuit leaves thegenerating sub-station, is transported via transmission line,distributed via distribution feeders, and ends as the secondary serviceenters the customers meter socket. This invention relates to themanagement of the transmission system, from a control center, whichpurpose is to maintain all equipment within operating limits and toensure the provision of electricity at a reliability rate greater than99.999%.

To manage the grid, electric utilities rely on Energy Management Systems(EMS) which are mission critical information system that collect datafrom the field and can control protection devices from the controlcenter via a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system (SCADA).

The EMS are more sophisticated today with advanced algorithms andincreasing volume of data coming from smarter grids that are equippedwith intelligent electronic devices (IED).

However, intelligent grids and sophisticate power system algorithms thatprocess field data will not suffice to prevent human errors in controlcenters. Operators continuously train to adapt to new system conditionsand react to emergency situations. This general aptitude to mastercomplex information and make correct decisions is referred to as“situation awareness”.

Catastrophic failures of a power system are relatively uncommon, butthey are spectacular when they happen. Twenty-five million people in thenortheastern United States lost electric power for 12 hours in 1965.Another blackout shut down New York City for several days in 1977. Andin 2003, the largest power failure in North American history left 40million people in an area in the United States stretching fromMassachusetts, Connecticut, New York and New Jersey west to Ohio andMichigan, and 10 million people in eastern Canada, without power. Thelack of adequate situational awareness at multiple levels was one of theroot causes of the Aug. 14, 2003 massive power blackout in NorthAmerica.

Designing tools for adequate Situation Awareness (SA) includes that thefollowing factors be kept in mind: so-called “enemies of situationalawareness”: attention tunneling, requisite memory trap; data overload;misplaced salience; complexity creep, errant mental models,out-of-the-loop syndrome; workload, anxiety, fatigue, and other stressfactors.

There is a need for methods that assess reliability of power systems ofa utility company. There is a further need for methods that assessreliability of power systems of a utility company with violation markersthat are displayed on a main overview display.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide methodsfor assessing reliability of power systems of a utility company.

Another object of the present invention is to provide methods forassessing reliability of power systems of a utility company withviolation markers that are displayed on a main overview display.

A further object of the present invention is to provide methods forassessing reliability of power systems of a utility company withviolation markers

and showing only those violations associated for a selected violatedelement on a monitored elements tab.

Yet another object of the present invention is to provide methods forassessing reliability of power systems of a utility company withviolation markers and showing vital data related to violations selectedon an overview display.

These and other objects of the present invention are achieved in amethod of assessing reliability of a power system of a utility company.At least one main overview display is obtained. Violation markers aredisplayed on the one main overview display. A monitored elements tab isupdated with a list of monitored elements.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of an energymanagement system of the present invention that provides real timeawareness of a potential energy management failure.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of an energymanagement system of the present invention which has situationaldashboard panels.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating one application of the FIG. 2system.

FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of a custom dashboard of the presentinvention sourced from three different displays.

FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating one embodiment of a method of thepresent invention that assesses potentially compromising situations of autility company.

FIG. 6 illustrates one embodiment of a fly-out and a pod of the presentinvention.

FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a geographical overview with abackground layer representing the aerial view of an area of the presentinvention.

FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating one embodiment of a method of thepresent invention that creates dynamic lists from selected areas of apower system of a utility company using rubber-banding or lassoing.

FIG. 9 illustrates one embodiment of area selection that can be usedwith the flow chart of FIG. 8.

FIG. 10 illustrates one embodiment of vital signs for a selected elementthat can be utilized with the flow chart of FIG. 8.

FIG. 11 is a flow chart illustrating one embodiment of a method of thepresent invention for managing high and low voltage conditions fromselected areas of a power system of a utility company.

FIG. 12 illustrates one embodiment of a MVAR Reserve dashboard that isautomatically calculated based on the selected area and can beassociated with the FIG. 11 flow chart.

FIG. 13 illustrates a 3D view of the available MVARs using the positiveand negative reactive reserves toolbar buttons, and can be associatedwith the FIG. 11 flow chart.

FIG. 14 is a flow chart illustrating one embodiment of a method of thepresent invention for assessing reliability of a power system of autility company.

FIG. 15 is associated with the FIG. 14 flow chart and illustrates thatif a new violation appears following the execution of the StateEstimator (SE), an alert is displayed of the viewport.

FIG. 16 is associated with the FIG. 14 flow chart and shows a selectedbranch.

FIG. 17 is associated with the FIG. 14 flow chart and shows how markersassociated with the monitored elements in post contingency violationsare displayed.

FIG. 18 is associated with the FIG. 14 flow chart and shows that todrill down into a particular violation, the operator can select aviolation marker for an Alarm on branch.

FIG. 19 is associated with the FIG. 14 flow chart and illustrates thatwhen a contingent element creates a violation, a square marker can beprovided.

FIG. 20 is associated with the FIG. 14 flow chart and illustrates thatselecting a contingent element marker can cause a display all violationsthat a particular contingent element creates.

FIG. 21 is associated with the FIG. 14 flow chart and shows aContingency Tab in a control panel.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

In various embodiments, the present invention provides a system andmethods for enhance situational awareness for a control center of autility company for improved energy management, to drill down onpotential conditions that effect the distribution of power, andmitigates these potential conditions before catastrophic failures occur,provide a real time application of advanced graphics to display thecurrent status of a power system of one or more utility companies, andthe like. The present invention represents a new and improved way todesign user interface, independently of the underlying application todisplay a 3D view of the available MVARs using the positive and negativereactive reserves toolbar buttons, as shown in FIG. 13.

The present invention represents a new and improved way to design userinterface, independently of the underlying applications, algorithms, ordatabases. The main display is therefore targeted at a specificoperator's task which may span several applications. Traditionally, aoperator had to navigate among different user interfaces to achieve thesame objective, albeit with much less productivity and slower reactiontime.

The present invention is designed for mission critical systems that dealwith large volume of data refreshed in real-time every seconds. Theseinformation systems cannot fail and must be available at a minimum99.95% of the time.

The present invention is also designed to re-use most of the existingsoftware applications already in place within the control center. Lowcost of maintenance is achieved with automatic generation of displaysand re-use of existing assets (software and hardware).

The systems and methods of the present invention can be used by utilitycompanies that have a system including but not limited to power systems.The present invention can also be used by water management systems,petro-chemical systems, transportations systems, and the like. The powersystem is managed to bring energy to an end user and includesgeneration, transmission and distribution system. With the presentinvention, satellite maps can be utilized.

As illustrated in FIG. 1, one embodiment of the present invention has anenergy management system that includes: a control center at a utilitycompany; logic resources coupled to the power system that provide a realtime notice of conditions which effect energy management of the utilitycompany; and at least one user interface at the control center coupledto the logic resources. The user interfaces provide real time situationawareness of a potential energy management failure. The conditions canbe one or more of energy, distribution, generation, transmission andenergy market systems.

With the use of situation awareness of the present invention, a realtime notice of conditions can be provided prior to an occurrence of, acatastrophic failure of power delivery, catastrophic power generation,catastrophic transmission and energy market systems and the like.

Situation awareness is perception and/or comprehension and is auditoryand/or visual. Situational awareness, (i) improves energy management,facilitates drilling down on conditions that can effect energymanagement, (ii) facilitates distribution of power, generation of power,transmission and energy market systems, (iii) mitigates the effects ofconditions that can create failures in energy management and (iv)mitigates conditions that can create failures including but not limitedto, delivery of power, generation of power, transmission and energymarket systems.

The logic resources and the user interface are coupled to the power ordistribution system of the utility company. The logic resources uses anoverview of the majority of the utility system and drills down to moredetailed views of the utility system.

The logic resources can be configured to re-use at least a portion ofdata and configurations from pre-existing software applications alreadyin place in the control center. As a non-limiting example, thepre-existing software applications can include information of, system 1lines, 1 line diagrams and/or asset information. The user interfacesprovide a specific operator's task that can scan one or several utilitycompany applications without navigating between different userinterfaces of the control center.

The user interfaces include graphics that display one or more of,current status, mitigating factors and recommendations of the powersystem for one or more utility companies. The user interfaces caninclude advanced graphics that display a current status of powergeneration, power generation, transmission and/or energy market systems.The user interfaces can be independent of an energy managementapplication. In one embodiment, the user interfaces are automaticallygenerated in response to data and configuration from pre-existingsoftware or pre-existing software applications and also uses its own.The user interfaces can be a model driven overview, where the modeldriven overview combines coordinate system based on a geographicalcoordinate system including but not limited to GIS and the like.

One or more context panels can be provided with context data relative toa given situation facing the utility company. One or more informationsystems can also be provided that are refreshed in real-time. By way ofnon-limiting examples, the information system can be refreshed in a timeperiod of from 1 second to 15 minutes, depending on the information andthe situation.

In another embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in FIGS. 2and 3, situational dynamic dashboards are created graphically anddynamically by operators. The situational dashboards can be builton-the-fly by combining subsets of, different displays, tabulars,one-lines, regional schematic and/or geographic overviews. The logicresources enable the operators to create their own dashboards from largegeographical overviews, regional schematic displays and station one-linedisplays to assist operators in assessing a potentially compromisingsituation of the electric power system. Portions of the displays thatare dropped onto a situational dashboard display can continue to beupdated in real-time with live data.

As a non-limiting example, the potentially compromising situation canbe, system violations of type branch, low voltage, high voltage and/ordelta voltage, low or high voltage situation in a given area of thesystem, actual or potential system violations as a result of megawattsor megavars, and the like. The situational dashboards can be builton-the-fly by combining subsets of different displays, tabulars,one-lines, schematic, geographic overviews and the like, onto adashboard area. The dashboards are saveable and reuseable, and areuseful for identifying potentially compromising situations.

FIG. 4 shows an example of a custom dashboard of the present inventionsourced from three different displays. The operator selects the displaysof interest. Snippets from the original displays are selected byrubber-banding, the selected area is cut (initiated by the operator“drag” operation) and then pasted, initiated by the operator “drop”operation, into the dashboard. The portions of the displays that aredropped onto a dashboard display continue to be updated in real-time.The result is a new dashboard display. Once created, a dashboard can besaved and recalled later just as any other display in the system and isrefreshed with live data. The benefits of a dynamically createddashboard, which is created to specifically address a situation, is thatit allows the operator to select only the information that is relevantto the situation which the operator is facing. This reduces the workloadon the operator since the operator needs to focus only on what isrelevant not a collection of displays which have vast amount ofinformation on it which may not be relevant. The concept is simple:provide the operator with only the information he needs to do the job,not all the data that the system has and letting the operator constantlyreview the data and extract what is needed. One the dynamic dashboardsare created they can be saved and re-used should the situation presentitself, thus eliminating setup time.

In one embodiment, a fly-out or data lensing is provided. A fly-out isan effective way to dynamically select an area of a large overviewdisplay of the power system, or any display for that matter to directthe operator attention to where or what in the power system needsattention without loosing perspective of the whole power system which isbeing monitored and controlled.

The operator selects an area of the overview which it wishes to focus onby rubber-banding or lasso the area. The selected area of interest iscut and pasted into a fly-out. The fly-out can be moved and resized bydragging and resizing the fly-out border to enhance the usability of thefly-out.

As illustrated in FIG. 5, projection lines are can be drawn from thesource display to the fly-out to maintain reference to the source suchthat the operator always knows about the reference source of thefly-out. The projection lines can be used with multiple fly-outs, andcan track multiple situations at the same time. This is importantbecause an operator may be tracking multiple situations at the same timeand must be aware of the context of each of the situations from themultiple situations. The projection lines provide the operator with anawareness of a context of situations and information about a referencesource of the fly-out.

A pod is a fly-out that has been un-pinned from the source display. Podscan be organized as additional windows to monitor specific informationsuch as overload condition on a power line or a low voltage condition.FIG. 6 shows an example of a fly-out and a pod. Situation awarenessprinciples can be utilized with the fly-out. The use of a fly-out allowsan operator to generate informational displays without ever leaving themain overviews in order to accomplish a goal. This reinforces the goalof providing a use case based application. The operator is provided withonly what it needs to the job and nothing else that can distract theoperator from the task that the operator has been asked to do.

FIG. 7 shows an example of a geographical overview with a backgroundlayer representing the aerial view of an area. Other types of operatorselected backgrounds, such as jpegs and bitmaps, can be used. In oneembodiment, geographic satellites are used to obtain the geographicaloverview. The operator can then pan and zoom, with different tilescoming up on the display.

Depending on the portion of the overview which is visible and the zoomlevel, the corresponding tile for the matching background is obtainedfrom the site. Once it is obtained it is locally cached for performanceimprovement and displayed as the background layer. As the operator pansand the zooms the display new tiles are retrieved and displayed. Forefficiency only, the required tiles are loaded into memory and visiblein the background.

For optimal visibility depending on the display and control roomlighting, the operator can adjust the opacity of the background imageusing a dialog which is available for invocation from an icon on thetoolbar.

FIG. 7 also shows a navigation window and a magnifier in use.

In another embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in FIG. 8, amethod is provided for creating dynamic lists from selected areas of thepower system of the utility company. The energy management system isused to access one or more source displays of a site. One or more of thesource displays are then rubber-banded or lassoed to create the selectedareas from at least a portion of the source displays. Lists, which canbe in tabular form, are dynamically created that display operatordefined information for each network element type in a list of networkelements from the selected areas that have been rubber-banded orlassoed. By way of illustration, and without limitation, the networkelements can include one or more of, substations, lines, generators,capacitors, loads, transformers, Static Var Compensators and Inductors,and the like. These lists are dynamically created for an operatorselected area of the power system to quickly obtain vital signs for thesystem within the selected area.

In this embodiment, the operator selects an area by rubber-banding orlassoing an area on the display using a device such as a mouse. All thenetwork elements in the selected area of interest are identified.

The selected area is dragged into a new control panel tab and droppedinto the tab. The action of “drag and drop” constitutes the creation ofa new list of elements the operator wants to obtain vital informationfor vital signs. The new list of elements is created by identifyingnetwork elements within a perimeter of the selected area. As anon-limiting example, the network elements can be each station and eachline within the boundary of the selected area.

The information, which makes up the vital signs, is operator definable.As a non-limiting example, the vital information can be one or more of,the state of the line, energization status of the lines, MegaWatt flows,MegaVar flows of the line, station load, station generation in MegaWattand MegaVars and the like. The present invention takes care ofretrieving, from the energy management system, the most recent dataassociated with this selection, and automatically keeps it up to date.Once the new list is created it can be saved and recalled for futureuse.

An area selection is shown in FIG. 9. Vital signs for a selected elementare shown in FIG. 10.

In one embodiment, the system of the present invention automaticallypopulates the list and receives vital data for all of the elements inthis list. The custom list can be given a name and saved for future use.

The control panel can have a special tab, called “Lists,” which containsthe names of all the custom-created areas. In one specific embodiment,the control panel has a MVAr Reserve tab that contains names ofdynamically created MVar Reserve areas for a selected geographicrepresentation of the power system.

Referring now to FIG. 11, the present invention also provides anoperator with knowledge about where and how much VAR Reserves areavailable. This is particularly useful for operators facing high or lowvoltage situations. In a such a situation the operator needs to know ifthere are sufficient Vars in the area where the low or high voltagecondition manifests itself so that they can be injected into or removedfrom the power system.

In another embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided formanaging high or low voltage conditions from selected areas of a powersystem of a utility company using VAR reserves. Selected geographic arerubber banded or lassoed and potential low or high voltage situationsare identified. The control panel can include a context menu. Thecontext menu can be used to show VAR reserves. Once the area isselected, the operator selects the option “Show Reserves” from thecontext menu to display the MVAR Reserves available within the area. Forthe selected area, all network elements are identified and a query isgenerated to obtain the MVAR Reserves associated with the identifiednetwork elements. Geographic displays are overlayed with superimposedVAR reserves to create overlayed geographic displays that are used toidentify potential low or high voltage instances in the selectedgeographic areas

In one embodiment, voltage contours are used to identify the potentiallow or high voltage instances. The overlayed geographic displays can beused to provide power flow information of the power system which can bein real time as well as to determine available VAR reserves. Thegeographic displays can be used to determine if there are sufficientVARS in portions or all of the selected geographic areas where low orhigh voltage conditions are manifest.

The location and amount of available VAR reserves is determined, andreal time information relative to location and amount of available VARreserves can be provided.

The available VAR reserves can be displayed as a summary for injectioninto the system and for absorption out of the system by device type,e.g., generation units, capacitor banks, reactor banks, and static Varsystems). FIG. 12 shows the MVAR Reserve dashboard, which isautomatically calculated based on the selected area. A query can begenerated to obtain MVAR reserves associated with the identified networkelements.

The injection/absorption reactive reserve is calculated based on thefollowing rules:

Generation Units: Considers only units that are not open or removed. Theinjection reactive reserve is (MVAR MAX−MVAR Out) and the absorptionreactive reserve is (MVAR Out−MVAR Min).

Capacitor Banks: Considers only caps that are not removed from thesystem. The injection reactive reserve is the summation of nominal MVARof caps that are open or disconnected. The absorption reactive reserveis the summation of nominal MVAR of caps that are closed.

Reactor Banks: Considers only reactors that are not removed from thesystem. The injection reactive reserve is the summation of nominal MVARof caps that are closed. The absorption reactive reserve is thesummation of nominal MVAR of caps that are open or disconnected.

Static VAR Systems: Considers only SVS that are not open or removed fromthe system. The injection reactive reserve is (MVAR MAX−MVAR Out) andthe absorption reactive reserve is (MVAR Out−MVAR).

A stacked bar chart provides detailed information about the MVARsavailability on a per-station basis and on a per-device-type, associatedwith the station basis. The height of the bar above the horizontal axisrepresents the amount of MVARs available to inject into the system fromthe station. The height of the bar below the horizontal axis representsthe amount of MVARs available to absorb (remove) from the system at thestation. For each station, the amount of MVARs that can be injected orabsorbed is shown below the chart, injected/absorbed.

The chart is sorted from the station with the most available injectionto the station with the least available injection. Clicking on the barwill cause the corresponding substation's one-line display to be calledinto the dashboard area. The operator can therefore rapidly identifywhich device needs to be operated on, using a familiar SCADA diagram.(Note: No control actions are allowed, the one-lines are read-onlydisplays.)

With the present invention, it is also possible to display a 3D view ofthe available MVARs using the positive and negative reactive reservestoolbar buttons, as shown in FIG. 13.

The selected area can be saved in the reserves tab in the control paneland recalled for future use. Once recalled the display is automaticallyrestored to the state when it was saved and the MVAR Reserves areupdated throughout the system using the most recent real-time values.

In another embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in FIG. 14,an operator can detect and analyze a base case violation using aReliability Assessment module. If a new violation appears following theexecution of the State Estimator (SE), an alert is displayed of theviewport, as shown in FIG. 15.

If the letters “SE” are visible, the State Estimator has detected one ormore new violations. To begin analyzing base case Violations, theoperator selects the Base Case Alert button on the Alert Panel. The mainOverview display is updated to show violation markers. A voltage contourat the highest KV level for which there are voltage violations isdisplayed. The Monitored Elements tab is updated with the list ofMonitored Elements in the Alarm, Violation, or Warning State. RoundMarkers are used to represent violations in an overview display. Thebranch violation marker is presented on the center of the branch. Thevoltage violation markers and transformer violation markers arepresented on the related substation. By way of illustration, and withoutlimitation, examples of markers are shown below:

Red marker, with label “183.2N”, representing a branch alarm for a MWvalue that exceeds the normal limit by 183.2% (v−limit=limit×1.832)

Red marker, with label “0.9N” on white background, representing avoltage alarm for a voltage value that exceeds the normal limit by 0.9%(v−limit=0.09×limit)

Orange marker, with label (Δ41.9E) on white background, representing avoltage drop violation for a voltage drop value that exceeds theemergency limit by 41.9% (v−limit=0.419×limit).

Red marker, with no label and white background, representing multipleviolations with different violation types and at least one alarm.

The marker symbol is defined as follows:

Marker Color to represent the Violation severity threshold(warning=yellow, violation=orange, alarm=red).

Marker Fill: White background for voltage violation and/or multipleviolations that have different violation types.

Label xxxS: The suffix S represents the limit being referenced (“N” forNormal, “E” for Emergency and “L” for Loadshed) and the numberrepresents the violation percentage over this reference limit. If thereis a prefix with Δ, it is a voltage drop violation.

If a new violation is detected relative to the previous run, a halo ispresented around the marker. The operator can now drill-down on aparticular violation by selecting a violation marker. Only the selectedone will appear on the display and all other violation markers willdisappear. The same happens in the Monitored Element tab in the controlpanel, which will only show the violations associated with the currentselected marker.

FIG. 16 shows a selected branch Alarm on the branch DOUGLAS-HANOVER. Thecontrol panel on the left is automatically open on the list of monitoredelements and positioned on this branch. The control panel monitoredelement list shows the vital data related to all violations selected inthe overview display. For each monitored element, the name and thehighest percent over the limit value being violated is displayed on thetop line.

By way of illustration, and without limitation, details for eachviolation can include:

The limit value, displayed as “Lxxx.xx”

The current value, displayed as “Vxxx.xx”

The percentage over the limit it violates.

In case of a branch, there might be two entries, one for each end of thebranch.

There can be two icons for each Monitored element in violation: one forlocating the element on the overview displays and one for calling theassociated line display in a dashboard tab to obtain more information.

In one embodiment of the present invention, an operator can detect andanalyze a contingency case violation using a Reliability Assessmentmodule. If a new violation appears following the execution of theContingency Analysis (CA), an alert is displayed on the top right corneras shown in FIG. 15. The operator selects the contingency alert buttonto begin analyzing Post Contingency Violations. Elements in Alarm,Violation, or Warning States as calculated by CA. The Contingent Tab inthe Control Panel is updated with the list of contingencies impactingMonitored Elements in violations.

The material presented on the Overview display is very similar for thebase case with the addition of being able to:

display contingency-related information, and

visualize and assess the relationship between monitored elements andcontingencies.

Using combinations of the Overview display, the Control Panel, and theViolation toolbar filters, the operator can drill down the PostContingency Case violations in both a graphical and a list format.

As shown in FIG. 17, markers associated with the monitored elements inpost contingency violations are displayed.

The violation markers associated with the monitored elements on theoverview display in the post contingency case have the same meaning asthe marker in the base case.

To drill down into a particular violation, the operator selects aviolation marker, as shown in FIG. 18 below, for the Alarm on branchDOUGLAS-HANOVER.

The control panel shows the element monitored with the followinginformation:

Name of the monitored element;

Type of violation;

Base Case Value (letter “V” in front of the value);

Post Contingency Value (letter “P” in front of the value);

Limit Value associated with the Alarm, Violation, or Warning beingpresented; and

Percent over the limit (N: Normal, E: Emergency, L: Loadshed).

A contingent element is a power system element that represents a definedcontingency in the CA application. When this contingent element createsa violation, a square marker, as shown in FIG. 19, appears on the branchor substation. The same principles as for violation markers apply:

As shown, color can be used to represent a violation's severity (worstcreated by the contingent element in case of multiple violations), asfollows:

White background: Voltage violation; and

No background: Branch violation.

Labe describes the worst violation in the same way as on a violationmarker.

As shown in FIG. 20, selecting a contingent element marker will displayall violations that this particular contingent element creates. TheContingency tab will be automatically opened and show a list ofcontingencies that are impacting the monitored elements in Alarm,Violation, or Warning states (refer to the Monitored Elements tab).

FIG. 21 shows the Contingency Tab in the control panel.

In one embodiment, for each contingency in the tab, the name ispresented as a tab item. Two icons are next to the name. One iconlocates the contingent element(s) on the overview display, and the othericon calls an associated display in a dashboard tab. You can obtaindetailed information related to the contingency by expanding the tree(i.e., click on the “+” sign to the left of the name). The expandedcontingent item will display a list of monitored elements it impacts.They are sorted using the same criteria as the monitored elements in theMonitored Elements Tab.

Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled inthe art from consideration of the specification and practice of theinvention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification andexamples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spiritof the invention being indicated by the following claims

1. A method of assessing reliability of a power system of a utilitycompany that has an energy management system with a control panel,comprising: obtaining at least one main overview display; selecting byan operator an area of the main overview display which it wishes tofocus on by at least one of rubber-banding or lassoing the area;detecting and analyzing a contingency case violation using a reliabilityassessment module; displaying an alert when a new violation appearsfollowing execution of the contingency case violation analysis;generating dynamically a contingent tab in the control panel with a listof contingencies impacting monitored elements in violations within theselected area; cutting and pasting the area into a fly-out; drawingprojection lines to the fly-out; and interacting with the fly-out toprovide the operator with an awareness of a context of situations andinformation about a reference source of the fly-out; interacting withthe fly-out to display violation markers on the one main overviewdisplay; and updating a monitored elements tab with a list of monitoredelements.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the monitored elements tabis updated with the monitored elements in a state of selected from atleast one of, alarm, violation, and warning state.
 3. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising: using a reliability assessment module todetect and analyze a base case violations.
 4. The method of claim 3,further comprising: displaying an alert in response to a new violation.5. The method of claim 4, wherein the alert is displayed of theviewport.
 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: displaying avoltage contour of voltages at all buses for all KV levels.
 7. Themethod of claim 1, wherein a branch violation marker is presented on acenter of a branch.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein voltage violationsare presented at the corresponding station where violated elementsreside.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein color of a marker indicatesthe severity of a violation.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein markeris used to indicate type of violation.
 11. The method of claim 1,further comprising: selecting a violation marker; and only displayingthe selected violation marker on the main overview display while havingthe other violation markers disappear while the user performs ananalysis of the situation.
 12. The method of claim 11, furthercomprising: showing only those violations associated for the selectedviolated element on the monitored elements tab.
 13. The method of claim1, further comprising: showing vital data related to violations selectedon the overview display.
 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising:showing the vital data with a control panel monitor element list showsthe vital data.
 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising:displaying at a top line a name and a highest percent over a limit valueviolated.
 16. The method of claim 1, wherein details for violations areselected from a least one of, limit value, current value and percentover the limit it violates.
 17. The method of claim 14, wherein theviolation is at a branch and an entry is provided for each end of thebranch.
 18. The method of claim 1, further comprising: providing twoicons for each monitored element in violation, with one icon locatingthe monitored element on the overview displays, and another icon forcalling an associated line display in a dashboard tab to obtainadditional information.
 19. The method of claim 1, further comprising:detecting and analyzing a contingency case violation using a reliabilityassessment module.
 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising:displaying an alert when a new violation appears following execution ofthe contingency case violation analysis.
 21. The method of claim 20,further comprising: updating a contingent tab in the control panel witha list of contingencies impacting monitored elements in violations. 22.The method of claim 21, further comprising: using user interfaces at thecontrol panel to analyze cause and effect from results provided bycontingency analysis.
 23. The method of claim 1, wherein materialpresented on the overview display includes contingency-relatedinformation.
 24. The method of claim 1, further comprising: visualizingand assessing a relationship between monitored elements andcontingencies.
 25. The method of claim 23, further comprising: usingcombinations of the overview display, the control panel, and violationtoolbar filters to enable a user to analyze the post contingency caseviolations.
 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the analyses isfacilitated by graphical and list formats.
 27. The method of claim 23,wherein the control panel shows the monitored element with at least oneof, name of the monitored element, type of violation, base case value,post contingency value, limit value associated with an alarm, violationor Warning being presented and a percent over a designated limit. 28.The method of claim 23, wherein when a contingent element creates aviolation, a violation maker appears on a branch or substation.
 29. Themethod of claim 28, further comprising: selecting a contingent elementmarker for a contingent element; and displaying all violations that thecontingent element creates.
 30. The method of claim 23, wherein thecontrol panel includes both a monitored elements tab and a contingencytab.
 31. The method of claim 30, wherein the contingency tab isautomatically opened when a contingency marker is selected to show alist of contingencies that are impacting the monitored elements in atleast one of, alarm, violation and warning states.